Microcrystalline saturated Iron glaze
firing to cone 10 in oxidation
Firing profile #1
Up Fire profile
150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F
400 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F
120 deg F an hour to 2310 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2310 deg F
Down Fire Profile
A half hour hold at 1750 deg F
A three hour hold at 1700 deg F
slow downfire at 25 deg F an hour in the interval 1700 deg F to 1650 deg F
A one hour hold at 1650 deg F
Firing Profile #2
Up Fire profile
150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F
400 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F
120 deg F an hour to 2240 deg F
60 deg F an hour to 2290 deg F
30 deg F an hour to 2300 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2300 deg F
Down Fire Profile
A half hour hold at 1750 deg F
A three hour hold at 1700 deg F
slow downfire at 25 deg F an hour in the interval 1700 deg F to 1650 deg F
A one hour hold at 1650 deg F
Firing Profile #3
Up Fire profile
150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F
400 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F
120 deg F an hour to 2240 deg F
60 deg F an hour to 2290 deg F with a hold of 15 minutes at 2290 deg F
60 deg F an hour to 2310 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2310 deg F
Down Fire Profile
A half hour hold at 1750 deg F
A three hour hold at 1700 deg F
slow downfire at 25 deg F an hour in the interval 1700 deg F to 1650 deg F
A one hour hold at 1650 deg F
discussion of firing profiles
Above are the firing profiles as one would program the electronic Kiln
Controller
The downfire part of these protocols, the part of the firing
after peak temperature is reached,
is the same for all three firing
protocols.
For that reason, and to simplify a discussion of the differences
between these three firing profiles,
they are separated into Up, and Down.
In both the second and third firing protocol The "sharp peak" at the top
of the firing curve is smoothed down.
The objective is to flatten the
top of the firing, slow it down to enable
the many chemical processes
within the glaze and body to catch up with each other.
The objective is to find a firing method which gives similar results on thin
and thick pots
for a saturated iron glaze, while maintaining the
appearance of the glaze seen on
thin walled test pots fired with Firing
Profile #1.
In smoothing the top of the firing curve in the region above 2240 deg F,
I subdivided that region
into three regions which I consider to successively
contribute more heat work to the final cone achieved in the firing.
These
regions are: 2240 to 2290 deg F, 2290 deg F - 2310 deg F, above 2310 deg F
Here is a table showing the amount of time spent in each of these regions
following the three firing profiles given above:
Time in temperature window
|
2240-2290 deg F
|
2290-2310 deg F
|
greater than 2310
deg F
|
|
firing 1
|
21.5 min
|
10 min
|
20 min
|
|
firing 2
|
50 min
|
40 min
|
0 min
|
|
firing 3
|
41 min
|
35 min
|
20 min
|
Comparing both firings with Firing #1, Firing #2 spends more time in the
regions 2240-2290 deg F,
and region 2290-2310 deg F, but less
time at or above 2310 deg F.
It is a bit less than half a cone cooler than
Firing #1.
Firing #3 also spends more time in regions 2240-2290 deg F, and 2290-2310
deg F, and equal time at or above 2310 deg F.
It is a bit less than
half a cone hotter than Firing #1.
Clay body is a grolleg porcelain from Tacoma Clay Art Center.
composition of the glaze
This is a high alkali metal saturated iron glaze.
Emperical Formula satIron_ZJ_1PP:
K2O 0.01
Na2O 0.47
Li2O 0.23
CaO 0.23
MgO 0.06
Al2O3 .47
Fe2O3 .2
SiO2 2.94
P2O5 .067
In Firing #1
satIron_ZJ_1PP on a 3.5 inch diameter bowl
satIron_ZJ_1PP on a plate 9 inches in diameter
In Firing #2
satIron_ZJ_1PP on a 3.5 inch diameter bowl
In Firing #3
satIron_ZJ_1PP on a plate 9 inches in diameter
Commentary
Note: The plates have an abstract design consisting of additional distinct
glazes
applied to the bare bisque independant of the background glaze.
The wall of a pot cooks from its outer edge through to its center, thick
steaks cook slower than thin, and so do pots.
Until The wall of the pot beneath the glaze reaches temperature it sucks heat
from the glaze.
Firing #2, and #3 were designed to compensate for this, Firing #2 reached a
lower cone, Firing #3 a higher cone.
Both had more time near the top of
the firing than Firing #1.
In both the result on a plate was closer to
that seen on the bowl in Firing #1, than to the plate in Firing #1.