I show a leaf print on two saturated iron glazes of differing viscosity
K2O 0.01
Na2O 0.47
Li2O 0.23
CaO 0.23
MgO 0.06
Al2O3 .47
Fe2O3 .19
SiO2 2.93
P2O5 .07
molecular percent Silica 63 %
K2O 0.09
Na2O 0.48
Li2O 0.26
CaO 0.15
MgO 0.02
Al2O3 .56
Fe2O3 .19
SiO2 3.49
P2O5 .04
molecular percent Silica 66 %
The glaze, satIron_ZJ_1PP has lower alumina and lower silica than the second
glaze satIron_ZJ_2.
The first glaze has less silica, and less alumina, as
a percent of the oxides in the glaze, unormalized by the fluxes.
The
result is a glaze which is less viscous.
Both pots are plates approximately 9 inches in diameter. The leaf print is
created by embedding a leaf in the wet glaze,
then after dry, staining with a
mixture of Feldspar and rutile, or Kaolin and rutile.
The leaf print on the glaze satIron_ZJ_1PP is an
undifferentiated blob, I could have achieved a similar result
by randomly
dribbling stain on the glaze. The glaze satIron_ZJ_1PP flowed
beneath the leaf
obliterating the details, texture and leaf veins, mixing
all together.
By contrast satIron_ZJ_2 hardly moves, leaving undisturbed the leaf structure, its veins and the ruckled undulating surface of the leaf.
Both glazes have fully gloss surfaces. Though satIron_ZJ_2 is the glossier
of the two glazes, with the smoother less textured surface,
nevertheless it is
cleary the more viscous glaze.
The surface texture
of a glaze is independant of its viscosity, i.e. of how readily it flows.
Both of these glazed show a variety of metallic surface crystals, all high in iron.
In any region one sort of crystal will dominate
as the various
crystals compete for the limited supply of iron. The glaze thickness
determines which type of crystal grows fastest,
and also the grain size of
the crystals grown.
Distinct crystals are often found in rings marking
the thickening of the glaze from rim to bottom
characteristic of glaze
applied by pouring into
a bowl shape.