July 2018 Cone 10 crystals
The effect in that firing was the result of an exageratedly long firing
between cone 5 and cone 10. The cones in the firing said cone 11.
The
base glaze on that pot, and on several other pots ran. In addition to the
uncontrolled running,
I didn't like the effect on my saturated iron
glazes. The next step for me, which I show here is to alter the glazes,
with the intent to get a flow in my usual firing at cone 10.
Here I modify only the inlay glaze, making it more fusible. I wanted to
get an effect that might be usable on the outside of a pot.
Next I will make the base glaze more fusible as well. That will be
trickier, as too fusible will again result
in flowing off the bottom of
the pot.
The two glazes below ran together, the crystals of the base glaze show as
a counterpoint to the streaks created by the runs of the inlay glaze.
Clay body is a grolleg porcelain from Tacoma Clay Art Center.
I show details of the flows on a bowl ~6 inches in diameter.
I also show a picture of the bowl.
glaze composition of the two glazes
Emperical Formula satIron_ZG_H_0:
K2O 0.01
Na2O 0.44
Li2O 0.32
CaO 0.17
MgO 0.06
Al2O3 .5
Fe2O3 .2
SiO2 2.74
P2O5 .045
molecular percent Silica 61 %
Emperical Formula candaceBlackB-Z12:
K2O 0.32
Na2O 0.18
Li2O 0.00
CaO 0.37
MgO 0.13
Al2O3 .56
Fe2O3 .23
SiO2 5.14
molecular percent Silica 74 %
Note: CandaceBlackB-Z12 has some cobalt added
The markings on the inside of the deap bowl are a second glaze inlay. The
glaze is filled in to an area that had been masked prior to
the pouring
of first layer of glaze. It was then waxed with an emulsion wax prior to
stripping the mask.
Close up Images of various of the markings
Image of the whole piece
bowl with glaze satIron_ZG_H_0 and glaze inlay CandaceBlackB