The interaction between two adjacent glazes.
Several closeups of the interaction region of the two glazes are shown and,
for context, a picture of the pot.
The background glaze is satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1PIron, the foreground design is
glazed with iron_8_R_C10_13PSi.
The design is created by adhering a mask and then applying the main
glaze. After drying, the entire pot is coated in wax,
150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F
400 deg F an hour to 1800 deg F
300 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F
120 deg F an hour to 2310 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2300 deg F
300 deg F an hour to 1750 deg F then a half hour hold at 1750 deg F
300 deg F an hour to 1700 deg F then a Three hour hold at 1700 deg F
25 deg F an hour to 1650 deg F then a one hour hold at 1650 deg F
K2O .24
Al2O3   .46
SiO2   3.13
molecular percent Silica 64%
K2O .11
Al2O3   .56
SiO2   3.12
molecular percent Silica 63%
The interaction region dominates the design, occasionally leaving nothing
untouched of the design glaze inlay.
The design glaze, iron_8_R_C10_13PSi, differs from the background glaze
satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1PIron in that
Otherwise, these two glazes seem to be saturated iron glazes with similar
compositions. However, they are
then the mask is removed
and the open area filled in with a second glaze.
Close up Images of the interaction region
Image of the piece
bowl with glaze satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1PIron and inlay iron_8_R_C10_13PSi
bowl is ~7 inches in diameter
oxidation firing to cone 10 in an electric kiln
Firing profiles
Up Fire profile
Down Fire Profile
Clay body is a grolleg porcelain from Tacoma Clay Art Center.
glaze compositions
Background glaze
Empirical Formula satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1PIron :
Na2O .22
Li2O .24
CaO .16
MgO .14
Fe2O3   .25
P2O5   .04
Inlay Glaze
iron_8_R_C10_13PSi :
Na2O .45
Li2O .25
CaO .17
MgO .02
Fe2O3   .28
Remarks
it contains no P2O5 and only a trace of
MgO.
not as similar as they might appear - else why
the strong reaction of the decoration glaze with the MgO and P2O5 diffusing
across the boundary between it and the background glaze?