Firing temperature vs. Time

I show the effect of more time above cone 5 together with lower firing temperature on a saturated iron glaze.

Both firings are cone 10, with nearly identical cones.

The first firing is fast to 2310 deg F, the second firing is slower but only to 2270 deg F.

First Firing

Faster firing to cone 10 at 2310 deg F.

Inside of pot:

full view

Outside of pot:

full view



Second Firing

Slower firing to cone 10 at 2270 deg F

Inside of pot:

full view

Outside of pot:

full view



oxidation firing to cone 10 in an electric kiln

Firing profiles

The differences between the first and second upfire profiles are:

The top temperature, 2310 deg F for the first, 2270 deg F for the second.

The temperature ramp is steeper for the first firing, slower for the second.

Up Fire profile 1

Faster and hotter:

150 deg F an hour to 200 deg F

400 deg F an hour to 1800 deg F

300 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F

120 deg F an hour to 2310 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2310 deg F

Down Fire Profile 1

300 deg F an hour to 1750 deg F then a half hour hold at 1750 deg F

300 deg F an hour to 1700 deg F then a three hour hold at 1700 deg F

25 deg F an hour to 1600 deg F then a one hour hold at 1600 deg F



Up Fire profile 2

Slower and cooler

150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F

400 deg F an hour to 1800 deg F

300 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F

120 deg F an hour to 2170 deg F

15 deg F an hour to 2270 deg F / hold 20 min

Down Fire Profile 2

300 deg F an hour to 1850 deg F then hold 3 hours

300 deg F an hour to 1600 deg F then a Three hour hold at 1600 deg F



The hold at 1850 deg F is to promote micro-crystals in Hank Murrows satin Celedon glaze.

The hold at 1600 deg F, is my usual for the metallic microcrystals in my saturated iron glazes.

Clay body is a grolleg porcelain from Tacoma Clay Art Center.

glaze composition

Empirical Formula glaze satIron_ZG_1S_1Munge :

K2O        .06
Na2O        .51
Li2O        .21
CaO        .21
MgO        .01

Al2O3        .53
Fe2O3        .19

SiO2        3.28
P2O5        .16

molecular percent Silica 63%



bowls are ~ 4 inches in diameter



Remarks

The first pair of pictures shows the result of an iron-saturated glaze from my usual firing profile. The result is a waxy matte glaze
that has a near dense coverage of metallic micro-crystals. It's orange-y rather than brown.

The second pair of pictures shows the variant firing, to a lower temperature and with a slower ramp. The result is a full gloss dark brown,
with no metallic micro-crystals. I attribute the lack of these metallic micro-crystals to the lower final firing temperature,
though the slower temperature ramp may be relevant as well. The glaze is fully mature, the visible pitting on the outside
of this pot is the result of a thin application of a viscous glaze.

The hold at 1600 deg F is present as required by those glazes for the development of the metallic micro-crystals.

I designed the second slow/low firing to test Hank Murrow's satin Celedon glaze. Nigel Wood, in his book Chineese Glazes,
remarks that celedon glazes fired too hot won't develop the crystals that give a satin surface texture. This firing was designed
to test that by having a lower final temperature. In order to reach cone 10 at a lower temperature, this firing
has a slower temperature ramp between cone 5 and cone 10.

Saturated iron glazes also develop metallic micro-crystals, but of a different species.
I wondered about the effect of a slower/lower temperature firing on iron-saturated glazes.
Several of my regular saturated iron glazes were in this firing for that reason.

Initial results indicate this slower lower temperature firing has a great impact on saturated iron glazes.
Yet there was a only a small non-impressive effect on the non iron bearing glazes in that slow/low firing.

Next is an even slower ramp to cone 10, with a lower final firing temperature.

I am greatly indebted to Hank Murrow for his generosity in sharing his glazes and knowledge of firing.

Carol's Home Page