Reactions at the interface between two glazes

The interaction at the interface of adjacent glazes.

Several closeups of the interaction region of the two glazes are shown and, for context, a picture of the pot.

The background glaze is satIron_ZG_4, the foreground design is glazed with satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1MFe

The design is created by adhering a mask and then applying the main glaze. After drying, the entire pot is coated in wax,
then the mask is removed and the open area filled in with a second glaze.



Close up Images of the interaction region

full view

full view

full view



Image of the piece

full view

bowl with glaze satIron_ZG_4 and inlay satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1MFe

bowl is ~9 inches in diameter



oxidation firing to cone 10 in an electric kiln

Firing profiles

Up Fire profile

150 deg F an hour to 250 deg F

400 deg F an hour to 1800 deg F

300 deg F an hour to 2050 deg F

120 deg F an hour to 2310 deg F with a hold of 20 minutes at 2310 deg F

Down Fire Profile

300 deg F an hour to 1750 deg F then a half hour hold at 1750 deg F

300 deg F an hour to 1700 deg F then a Three hour hold at 1700 deg F

25 deg F an hour to 1650 deg F then a one hour hold at 1650 deg F

Clay body is a grolleg porcelain from Tacoma Clay Art Center.

glaze compositions

Background glaze

Empirical Formula satIron_ZG_4 :

K2O        .10
Na2O        .50
Li2O        .18
CaO        .16
MgO        .06

Al2O3        .56
Fe2O3        .2

SiO2        3.54
P2O5        .04

molecular percent Silica 66%



Inlay Glaze

satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1MFe :

K2O        .24
Na2O        .22
Li2O        .24
CaO        .16
MgO        .14

Al2O3        .47
Fe2O3        .09

SiO2        3.17
P2O5        .04

molecular percent Silica 66%



Remarks

After firing, the area covered by the design mask is reduced to half its original width.

The fluid inlay glaze eats beneath the matrix glaze allowing crystals formed in the matrix glaze to migrate into the design region.
An opaque version of the inlay glaze peeks out between discrete matrix crystals.

Chemical reactions and fluid flow combine unpredictably.

Here, the difference in behavior between these two glazes is especially striking because the inlay glaze satIron_ZG_1O_1Q_1MFe is derived,
by a convoluted path, from the same root glaze as satIron_ZG_4.

These are both high alkali metal glazes with similar silica, and silica:alumina ratio.
satIron_ZG_4 has somewhat higher alumina and silica, and lower Magnesia. I'd not have predicted the difference
in either viscosity, nor crystal growth. I'd especially not have predicted that higher viscosity
would combine with greater crystal growth.

Carol's Home Page